Categories
News

Alberta’s Coming Declaration of Independence?

For many Albertans it’s 1775. At the time that the Colonies were still part of the British Empire; it’s, consequently, an British as far as an American record, and that’s why its logic has a broad appeal today in the Canadian West.
All American schoolchildren understand how it begins: when a single people seeks to dissolve the political bonds with the next, a decent respect for the opinions of humanity”needs that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation” When authorities are destructive of those ends,”it’s the right of individuals to abolish it” This was the position of American Patriots in the Thirteen Colonies in 1776; such is the position of many Alberta Patriots now.
The Confederation of those four first colonies, now the states of Ontario, Quebec, Nova Scotia, and New Brunswick, occurred in 1867. On the west of the Canada of the St Lawrence river valleywhere we call Laurentian Canada, place the Hudson’s Bay Company lands, even in law a plantation, with a status like Jamestown in seventeenth-century Virginia. In 1869 the Imperial Crown moved this massive land to the Crown in right of Canada. Canada indemnified the Company for”improvements” made over the previous two decades, but it wasn’t bought, since Alaska was bought from Russia.
Some Company land was given to Quebec; some to Ontario. All of the remainder, in the western border of Ontario to the peak of the Rocky Mountains was earmarked”for purposes of the Dominion,” that is, for the benefit of Laurentian Canada.
The Laurentians disregarded the presence of a flourishing and, to use the speech of the afternoon, a”civilized” payoff at Red River, present-day Winnipeg. They hadn’t been consulted with respect to the move, nor did they agree to it. Canada never created anything such as the Northwest Ordinance of 1789, the terms of which enabled the orderly incorporation of the people of the American shore into the United States. Rather, Canada used an primitive royal statute to annex both the Northwest and all its inhabitants. A long-time competitor to Company principle, Alexander Kennedy Isbistersaid the land had been degraded into a”colony of a colony”
In the event the people of Red River were likely to join Confederation, it’d be on their own terms, as British Columbia had completed. They found themselves as outspoken citizens, not scatter topics. Laurentian Canada thought otherwise, both in 1870 and fifteen years later when it deployed a military power to extinguish a armed battle to their distant imperial principle.
The Northwest stayed a colony of a colony until 1905 when two new provinces, Alberta and Saskatchewan, were created. Neither was a full-scale state because, unlike every other state, they failed to restrain the chief sources of revenue, specifically public lands and natural sources. James Mallory once said they had been states”in the Roman feeling,” where he meant that, such as Trans-Alpine Gaul, the West could be ruled by a new Rome, Ottawa, as a conquered territory. In return, such as Roman provincials, Westerners were forced to pay tribute–taxation –to Laurentian Canada. This legal subordination continued until 1930 when the prairie states were granted control of their natural resources.
Laurentian Canadians still thought the West and its sources have been benefit them. The sources changed, from fur to wheat, potash, uranium and now: hydrocarbons. Accordingly, when the Yom Kippur war drove up the price of petroleum, the Ottawa found a”made in [Laurentian] Canada” cost that subsidized oriental consumers. As the national energy ministry, Marc Lalonde, reluctantly said he desired”to move wealth from Alberta to central Canada.”
Albertans have tried to operate inside the system. Consider Senate reform. Currently all Senators are made by Ottawa. Alberta contains 6. Attempts by Albertans to establish an elected, equal and effective–or”triple E” Senate–have failed. The Supreme Court of Canada said change necessitated that a constitutional amendment, which effectively made any reform hopeless.
A second intractable problem is official bilingualism. The coverage was introduced by Pierre Trudeau in the late 1960s as a language proficiency evaluation. It was always really much more. About 16% of Canadians are bilingual and almost two-thirds of these have French as their first language. Nearly all are out of Laurentian Canada, mostly from Quebec. About half the positions in the national bureaucracy are designated bilingual; bilingualism is required for the majority of the positions at the top, though the actual numbers are secret. What started as a plan to ensure French-speakers believed at home in Ottawa became a plan for opposing Quebec separatists and therefore promoting”national unity” Laurentians ignore the fact that bilingualism is distant from Western historical experience, but to these bilingualism is that the defining characteristic of their vision of the country.
Increasing numbers of Albertans view recent efforts by Ottawa to destroy their economy as the culmination of a very long train of abuses that started a century and a half ago.Senate reform and bilingualism are just persistent annoyances. The assault on the Alberta economy as well as also the manifest unfairness of what is called”equalization” coverage are more serious. The target, which is more a policy directive compared to a real principle of constitutional law, was to guarantee comparable public services at comparable taxation amounts.
Every Albertan understands the result. Since 1961 the web national transfer from the state continues to be $630B; now it’s about $20B a year (almost $22,000 for every family of four in the state ). The net federal move into Quebec was $497B; now it’s about $13B a calendar year, two-thirds of each equalization dollar. After the oil industry was booming few Albertans whined about spreading the wealth around.
In the last decade, however, as of deliberate national policy decisions that have almost destroyed the oil industry, acquiescence in the equalization program has changed. An heavy regulatory burden persuaded Enbridge to cancel a planned pipeline to the Pacific from 2015; Trans Canada left its planned pipeline to New Brunswick in 2017; Kinder Morgan gave up attempting to double its current pipeline to Vancouver in 2018. Albertans call C-69 that the”no more pipelines” law.
Back in September 2019 that the Trudeau government passed Bill C-48, which prohibited Canadian-based oil tankers from drifting the north coast of BC while permitting US tankers to ship Alaska primitive to 17 refineries from the lower 48. The joint effect of those laws is to ensure that any new generation in Alberta is going to be hauled by costly and relatively dangerous railroad cars, mostly to American refineries around the Gulf coast at discounted prices.
Another assault on the economy was a carbon taxation. The result has been to push away investment from Alberta to significantly less costly (mostly American) jurisdictions. Since 2015 about $100B in proposed capital investment has disappeared. The Alberta oil sector collapsed when business was booming in Texas and North Dakota, which explains exactly the reason so many Alberta businesses moved south. Trans-Canada Pipelines even renamed itself TC Energy to be more at home in Texas and Mexico.
Increasing amounts of Albertans see recent efforts by Ottawa to destroy their economy as the culmination of a very long train of abuses that started a century and a half ago. How irrational is that? This point was made for many years, most recently by Jason Kenney, premier of Alberta, when he told Yves-Francois Blanchet, leader of the Quebec separatist party that he can not have his cake and eat it. Monsieur Blanchet responded:”you know everything? I like my cake and I will do what I like about it.”
Blanchet was right. On December 7, 2018 that the Premier of Quebec declared there was”no social acceptability” for a pipeline passing through Quebec. The next day the national finance ministry announced a $1.4B increase in transport funds to Quebec. That’s also, Quebec was honored for blocking efforts of Alberta to send its major export to world markets. The goose that laid the golden eggs has been served up for supper. More prosaically, Laurentians have been willing to destroy the oil sector as it’s based in a state of political significance for these: Alberta.
The conflict between Alberta and Laurentian Canada is not merely about economic exploitation. The histories and the mythologies of those two areas are antithetical. Laurentia was conditioned by defeat: of this French by the English in 1759 at Quebec, of the Loyalists by the Patriots following the Revolution.
By comparison, the payoff of the Prairie West, despite Laurentian military success in 1885 wasleast settlers, akin to the victory of pioneer merit and grit recognizable to American tales regarding the”winning of the west” This is the reason Albertans have significantly more in common with their neighbors in Montana than with fellow citizens in both Ontario and Quebec.
The current Alberta government has plans to hold a referendum next fall about the continued acceptability of transfer payments. Just about everyone expects that the vote to be in favour of ending the plan of equalization. Then what?
Premier Kenney is of the opinion that such a vote will strengthen his hands in re-negotiating the app. Alberta Patriots fully anticipate Laurentian Canada to refuse any proposals from hand, thus precipitating a major political crisis
Alberta’s 1776 is quickly approaching. Stay tuned.